The Manchester Arena attack , was the last terrorist attack (at least in Europe ). The killer is always the same, a loner, misfit, a member of poor Muslim immigrant communities and the most of them, were followers of the Islamic State militant group.
However, when it comes to news like these, the media has different opinion. With the young blood still fresh, these hyenas of "information", the 'Mass Media of Brainwashing', are trying to force people to forget the crime and not blaming the immigrants, that's why they are naming the killer(s) as a 'lone wolf' and, for this attack, they were done only a few scattered parents' interviews about how their children were saved from this carnage. But this time he was not alone, as he acted as a part of a network [3, 4]. And, let's note that the 'lone wolf' terrorist is a myth .
And you can't be sure what's coming next, as the Manchester suicide bomber may have built a second device which is now in the hands of fellow jihadists, police fear . And in London, a venue evacuated due to bomb scare . Europe is going to live in fear for the coming years and it's European People's fault.
Muslim Leader: "Islam Teaches to Behead People and Caused The Manchester Attack"
My opinion is that things might have been different if people did not support all these mechanisms that sets the 'next guillotine' for him and his children. Political parties, politicians, media, and organizations feed from the people and measure their reactions to various things they want to test. West people in last years, for the most part, have supported these policies (either by voting, tolerance or abstaining).
An Italian journalist, Francesca, who wanted to be progressive and anti-racist, went as a correspondent of a TV show on an Italian channel, to complain about the state of immigrants at a Hotspot in Italy. However, the men who where there, saw her and tried to... return the favor (at 1:30 you can hear her screaming in fear). Better luck next time, Francesca.
On the one hand, there is the 'road to globalization', the new order, which it was setting up for years by parties with various signs and colors, who preserve the myth of democracy and confrontation, but in essence their views are a bit different, and behind the curtains they are cooperatives in the same project of the extinction of the nations, the execution of the peoples, and the inauguration of the darkest period that mankind will experience. And on the other hand, there are those who resist it. But there are few and their voices can't heard enough.
The Handmaid's Tale TV series , shows the totalitarian and Christian fundamentalist government of Gilead rules the former United States amidst an ongoing civil war. Society is organized along a new, militarized, hierarchical regime of Bible-inspired social and religious fanaticism and newly-created social classes, in which women are brutally subjugated, and by law are not allowed to work, own property, control money, or read. Widespread infertility due to warfare-induced environmental contamination has resulted in the conscription of the few remaining fertile women — called Handmaids — who are assigned to the homes of the ruling elite, where they must submit to ritualized sex with their male masters in order to become pregnant and bear children for those men and their wives. But are not the Christian's who does that, but this is what the Islamization of Western societies will be done.
Roosh V (Daryush Valizadeh) is an American (originated from Iran and Armenia) blogger and writer known for his positions related to the so-called manosphere . Critical to feminism and the femininity of the modern man, Roosh writes on his personal blog and is the administrator of the 'Return of Kings' website where he seeks, in my opinion, the restoration of the dominant role of man in western society . The books he has written, his posts and his videos have made many -from the "other" side- to call him "misogynist" and a 'modern world' hater .
Roosh V assumes that women, for reasons of their nature, support parties that have a left-wing agenda, in favor of mass immigration, of "open borders" policy, of recognizing all kinds of "rights" (like for example "Homosexual marriage", adoption by homosexual couples, illegal immigrants rights etc.), in favor of the cultivation of a society without gender, in favor of a general support of "equality" and many more.
Especially in the matter of mass immigration and the Islamization of Western societies, the attitude of women should logically be negative, as the life for the western woman has become intolerable, with regions and cities being now "forbidden areas" , where even the police have lost their control .
For them, with constant rape, sexual abuse, etc., not to mention the culture of devaluation and subordination for women those people have. But women are the first to welcome refugees and the same goes for gay people, where gay men are not so welcome in those societies .
The truth is that the female gender has a tendency towards "equality", while men are more interested in strength, prevalence of the stronger, preservation of tradition, defense of the family and the ancestral lands and the survival of the nation. This is not always the case, but is a general trend.
Roosh V has the solution. If women stop voting, Western Civilization will be saved . Otherwise there is no hope. We will be overwhelmed by third-country illegal immigrants and Western civilization will be lost. But I do not know if things are so absolute. Because women also vote in countries that are able to stand still and fighting to keep their identity (Hungary, Poland, Russia, etc.). As you can understand things are not so simple and the subject is big enough and "hot".
After the carnage in Manchester, Roosh uploaded the above video, where he says what you read in his article [Link #14). The video is good. His thoughts are right. So is his... pessimism. The only problem is the solution.
Note that I am not saying that I totally agree with Roosh's points. Neither I disagree with the immigration. I believe that people should be free to live wherever they want to live. But the immigrants shouldn't be allowed to pass their laws, views and cultures to the West, neither to have the freedom to make "forbidden areas", with their laws inside. The borders must be tightly controlled to avoid murderers in the West.